DoD R, “Department o£ Defense Personnel Security Program,” December , is hereby canceled as of December 31, DoD M – National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual. ( NISPOM) DoD R – Personnel Security Program. DOD R: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM.
|Published (Last):||13 March 2012|
|PDF File Size:||2.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A formal diagnosis of a disorder is not required for there to be a concern under this guideline. We do everything necessary to establish that the client is, in fact, trustworthy, reliable and sufficiently possessed of sound and discerning judgment. As it becomes easier for 5200.2-g to access computer databases, ease of use means ease of abuse. The term information technology systems as used here includes all computer hardware, software, firmware, doe and data used for the communication, transmission, processing, manipulation, storage or protection of information.
It impairs judgment, reduces inhibitions, and increases any doe toward aggression. They can steal information, change information or destroy information in automated file systems while sitting at their desk and doing nothing that appears out of the ordinary to casual observers. When information of security concern becomes known about an individual who is currently eligible for access to classified information, the adjudicator should consider whether the person:. The role of the adjudicator is to ensure that all doubts dof personnel being granted eligibility for access to classified information shall be resolved in favor of national security.
Sexual behavior that involves a criminal fod indicates a personality or emotional disorder; reflects a lack of judgment or discretion; or may subject an applicant to undue influence or coercion, exploitation or duress can raise questions about the applicant’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified national security information CNSI. What we do for clients facing a suspension, revocation or non-issuance of a security clearance is similar to what 520.2-r do for clients whose professional licenses are in jeopardy.
The vast majority of juvenile offenders get into trouble only once or twice and they stop offending as they mature.
Emotionally stable and well-adjusted individuals generally respond to these experiences in positive ways; by learning from them, adjusting their expectations, working harder or sticking with their core values.
Conflicts of interest can take many forms, including employment, consulting, volunteering and political activities. In some cases, clients have had their eligibility for access to classified information or employment ddod sensitive duties suspended, and must defend against a permanent revocation of eligibility to hold a clearance.
If after evaluating information of security concern, the adjudicator decides that the information is not serious enough to warrant a recommendation of disapproval or revocation of the security clearance, it may be appropriate to recommend approval with a warning that future incidents of a similar nature may result dodd revocation of access.
The adjudicator is not just a reviewer and reporter of information. In evaluating the 52002-r of an individual’s conduct, the adjudicator will consider the 13 Adjudicative Guidelines and cross reference them with the following below-listed 9 Adjudicative Factors:. Any deliberate violation of security rules or regulations, including Handling Protected Information during 5200.2-d employment in the private sector, is a significant concern, as it may indicate indifference toward national security or a general inability or unwillingness to abide by the security regulations.
DoD R, “Personnel Security Program,” 1/
A preference for a foreign entity may cause a person to make decisions that are contrary to the interests of 5200.2-g United States. Skip to main content Press Enter. If you are in the military, a government contractor, or if you are a government civilian, your security clearance is, in all likelihood, a pre-requisite to your career. The adjudication process is the careful weighing of a number of variables known as the whole-person concept.
It indicates that the employee-employer relationship, too, is likely to withstand the inevitable rocky periods that crop up in most relationships and which might otherwise cause the employee to turn against the employer. They seldom make impulsive decisions that they regret later. Allegiance is the loyalty that a citizen owes to his or her country.
DOD Adjudicative Elements – Security Clearance
The voluntariness of participation. One knowledgeable source who reports credible adverse information may outweigh 520.02-r acquaintances who claim never to have seen evidence of such behavior.
Passwords and User IDs are used to control access to the system data, and procedures are in place to deter and detect browsing and unauthorized access.
Evidence from past espionage cases indicates that alcohol problems are more prevalent among convicted spies than in the population as a whole. Some alcohol use is 5200.2-f, but excessive use can be a serious security concern.
Foreign Influence Foreign contacts and interests become a security concern if an applicant has divided loyalties or if foreign financial interests can be manipulated or induced to help a foreign person, group, organization or government in a way that is not in the interests of the United States. Most government organizations and private businesses do not know and cannot measure accurately how much they suffer from theft in the workplace by employees or outsiders.
The information collected must be sufficient to allow an affirmative or negative determination of a person’s eligibility for access to classified information. Access to records is limited to individuals who are properly screened and cleared on a need-to-know basis in the performance of their duties.
DOD 5200.2-R PDF
All information, both favorable eod unfavorable, is weighed. The complexity of human behavior severely limits any ability to codify such thresholds for making adjudicative decisions.
The adjudication process seeks reasonable assurance that persons granted access to classified information are persons:.